
In layman’s terms: the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has decided to hear a case about New Jersey’s ban on “assault weapons” and “high capacity magazines” in front of the full bench of judges, an unusual move given that a smaller panel just heard oral arguments and has not yet issued a decision.
In a rare move, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals has decided to rehear, en banc, a major challenge to New Jersey’s ban on semi-automatic rifles and standard capacity magazines.
In a sua sponte order issued on August 21 by Chief Judge Michael Chagares, the court directed the en banc hearing to take place on Wednesday, October 15, 2025, beginning at 9:30 a.m., in Philadelphia, PA.
Oral arguments in this case were presented to a three-judge panel of the same court less than two months ago on July 1, and the panel has not yet even issued its decision, which makes the court’s directive to hear it en banc even more unusual. (An en banc hearing is a legal proceeding where a case is heard by a larger group of judges than the usual panel in an appellate court, and is usually quite rare.)
The case at hand, now known as ANJRPC v. Platkin, is actually a consolidation of three cases:
- ANJRPC v. Platkin (3:18-cv-10507) – Challenged NJ’s ban on magazines that hold more than 10 rounds, ANJRPC case
- Ellman v. Platkin (3:22-cv-04397) – Challenged NJ’s ban on commonly-owned semiautomatic rifles, ANJRPC case
- Cheeseman v. Platkin (1:22-cv-04360) – Challenged NJ’s ban on commonly-owned semiautomatic rifles, FPC case
In July of 2024, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey ruled that New Jersey’s ban on the Colt AR-15 (by name) is unconstitutional, but also found that the ban on “large capacity magazines” was somehow constitutional.
Mark Smith, host of the Four Boxes Diner YouTube Channel, and contributor at News2A, speculated in a recent video that a draft opinion by the panel (which would not have found AR-15s to be protected arms) was likely circulated to the full court, and resulted in the court taking unprecedented action to curtail that decision in order to find a decision in favor of the Second Amendment.
The composition of the Third Circuit is currently 6-6 in terms of judges who tend towards conservative versus liberal positions on Second Amendment issues. 2A-friendly Emil Bove was recently appointed to the Third Circuit with a nomination confirmed by the Senate on July 29, 2025, in a 50-49 vote. Judge Bove swings the Court to a 7-6 position. There remains one seat to be filled with a confirmation expected soon that will likely swing the balance to 8-6.
“It is mission critical in my view that the pending nomination of future judge, we hope, Jenn Mascott to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals be expedited and confirmed by the US Senate in time for her to be able to sit and hear argument on October 15, 2025. That would give the Third Circuit another Trump appointee on that court,” said Smith.
Jennifer Mascott has been nominated for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit to fill a Delaware seat vacated by Judge Kent Jordan.